Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) is used in patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss when hearing aids provide limited or no benefit for speech perception. Studies on this topic reported tinnitus reduction as a common side effect of the electrical activation after cochlear implantation. So far, it is unclear what the effect is when patients do receive their implant primarily because of tinnitus complaints.
Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of the electrical stimulation with a cochlear implant in patients with tinnitus as a primary complaint, by systematically reviewing the literature.
Methods: Two independent authors identified studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Original studies reporting outcomes of electrical stimulation by cochlear implantation for primarily tinnitus (defined as severe or incapacitating distress levels) were included, if they reported a follow-up of at least three months. The pre- and post-implantation tinnitus distress scores on single and/or multi-item questionnaires of the included studies were extracted.
Results: In total, 4091 unique articles were retrieved. After screening titles, abstracts and full texts, we included seven prospective cohort studies (105 subjects in total, range: 10-26). All studies had considerable risks of bias. All tinnitus patients in the included studies had asymmetrical hearing loss or single-sided deafness. A statistically significant tinnitus distress improvement based on tinnitus questionnaire scores was found in every study.
Conclusion: Our systematic review reveals that electrical stimulation by cochlear implants in patients with a primary complaint of tinnitus has a positive impact on tinnitus distress. Nevertheless, only small sample sizes were found and studies showed considerable risks of bias. a .
Keywords: Asymmetrical hearing loss; Cochlear implant; Single-sided deafness; Systematic review; Tinnitus.
© 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Peter N, Liyanage N, Pfiffner F, Huber A, Kleinjung T. Peter N, et al. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Oct;161(4):576-588. doi: 10.1177/0194599819846084. Epub 2019 May 7. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019. PMID: 31060475
Távora-Vieira D, Marino R, Acharya A, Rajan GP. Távora-Vieira D, et al. Otol Neurotol. 2015 Mar;36(3):430-6. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000707. Otol Neurotol. 2015. PMID: 25594387
Mertens G, De Bodt M, Van de Heyning P. Mertens G, et al. Hear Res. 2016 Jan;331:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.016. Epub 2015 Oct 24. Hear Res. 2016. PMID: 26433053
Blasco MA, Redleaf MI. Blasco MA, et al. Otol Neurotol. 2014 Sep;35(8):1426-32. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000431. Otol Neurotol. 2014. PMID: 24786540 Review.
Arts RA, George EL, Stokroos RJ, Vermeire K. Arts RA, et al. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Oct;20(5):398-403. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283577b66. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012. PMID: 22931903 Review.
Wesarg T, Kuntz I, Jung L, Wiebe K, Schatzer R, Brill S, Aschendorff A, Arndt S. Wesarg T, et al. Audiol Neurootol. 2024;29(4):271-289. doi: 10.1159/000535383. Epub 2024 Feb 22. Audiol Neurootol. 2024. PMID: 38387454 Free PMC article.
van Genuchten S, Gilles A, Mertens G, Andries E, Cardon E, Van Rompaey V, Lammers M, Vanderveken OM, Jacquemin L. van Genuchten S, et al. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 May;281(5):2281-2291. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08339-5. Epub 2023 Dec 6. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 38052757
Deklerck AN, Swinnen F, Keppler H, Dhooge IJM. Deklerck AN, et al. Brain Sci. 2023 Oct 20;13(10):1484. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13101484. Brain Sci. 2023. PMID: 37891851 Free PMC article.
Hesse G, Kastellis G. Hesse G, et al. HNO. 2024 Jan;72(Suppl 1):51-55. doi: 10.1007/s00106-023-01331-9. Epub 2023 Oct 4. HNO. 2024. PMID: 37792096 Free PMC article. Review.
Hesse G, Kastellis G. Hesse G, et al. HNO. 2023 Oct;71(10):656-661. doi: 10.1007/s00106-023-01333-7. Epub 2023 Aug 8. HNO. 2023. PMID: 37552280 Review. German.